Morris v. White
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
CURTIS MORRIS PLAINTIFF
V. NO. 3:24-cv-00081-JM-ERE
JACOB WHITE and J.B. HOYER DEFENDANTS ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Curtis Morris has filed a motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. 2), but he has not filed a complaint properly commencing this lawsuit. See FED. R. CIV. P. 3 (“A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court”). Therefore, the Court lacks the authority to review his motion. See Powell v. Rios, 241 Fed. Appx. 500, 505 n. 4 (10th Cir.2007) (“only a properly-filed complaint can commence a civil action” and “(a)bsent a properly- filed complaint, a court lacks power to issue preliminary injunctive relief”); Stewart v. U.S. I.N.S., 762 F.2d 193, 198 (2nd Cir. 1985) (same); Adair v. England, 193 F. Supp.2d 196, 200 (D.D.C. 2002) (same). Mr. Morris has thirty days to file a complaint. In his complaint, Mr. Morris should: (1) specifically state the constitutional claim or claims he asserts against each Defendant; (2) describe facts to show that his proposed claims are plausible; (3) explain any injury he suffered as a result of each Defendants’ unconstitutional conduct; and (4) identify the relief he is seeking (such as money damages or injunctive relief).
In his complaint, Mr. Morris need only include a “short and plain statement” showing that he is entitled to relief, with factual allegations that are “simple, concise, and direct.” FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(1) & (d). At this early stage, there is no need to
identify witnesses or to describe evidence that he may rely on later to prove his claim. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Mr. Morris must file a complaint within thirty (30) days of the entry of
this Order. 2. If Mr. Morris fails to file a complaint, this case may be dismissed. 3. The Clerk is instructed to provide Mr. Morris a blank 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint form, along with a copy of this Order. 4. Mr. Morris’ motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. 2) is DENIED.1
1 If Mr. Morris intends to pursue preliminary relief, he must separately file a proper motion and supporting brief. See Local Rule 7.2(e) (motions for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions “shall not be taken up and considered unless set forth in a separate pleading accompanied by a separate brief”); compare FED. R. CIV. P. 65(a) (requirements for obtaining a temporary restraining order without notice to the opposing party) with (b) (requirements for obtaining a preliminary injunction with notice to the opposing party). SO ORDERED 15 May 2024.
iN es STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. White (Morris v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.