Morris v. White
This text of Morris v. White (Morris v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION
CURTIS MORRIS PLAINTIFF
V. NO. 3:24-cv-00081-JM-ERE
JACOB WHITE and J.B. HOYER DEFENDANTS ORDER
Pro se plaintiff Curtis Morris has filed a motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. 2), but he has not filed a complaint properly commencing this lawsuit. See FED. R. CIV. P. 3 (“A civil action is commenced by filing a complaint with the court”). Therefore, the Court lacks the authority to review his motion. See Powell v. Rios, 241 Fed. Appx. 500, 505 n. 4 (10th Cir.2007) (“only a properly-filed complaint can commence a civil action” and “(a)bsent a properly- filed complaint, a court lacks power to issue preliminary injunctive relief”); Stewart v. U.S. I.N.S., 762 F.2d 193, 198 (2nd Cir. 1985) (same); Adair v. England, 193 F. Supp.2d 196, 200 (D.D.C. 2002) (same). Mr. Morris has thirty days to file a complaint. In his complaint, Mr. Morris should: (1) specifically state the constitutional claim or claims he asserts against each Defendant; (2) describe facts to show that his proposed claims are plausible; (3) explain any injury he suffered as a result of each Defendants’ unconstitutional conduct; and (4) identify the relief he is seeking (such as money damages or injunctive relief).
In his complaint, Mr. Morris need only include a “short and plain statement” showing that he is entitled to relief, with factual allegations that are “simple, concise, and direct.” FED. R. CIV. P. 8(a)(1) & (d). At this early stage, there is no need to
identify witnesses or to describe evidence that he may rely on later to prove his claim. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Mr. Morris must file a complaint within thirty (30) days of the entry of
this Order. 2. If Mr. Morris fails to file a complaint, this case may be dismissed. 3. The Clerk is instructed to provide Mr. Morris a blank 42 U.S.C. § 1983
complaint form, along with a copy of this Order. 4. Mr. Morris’ motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order (Doc. 2) is DENIED.1
1 If Mr. Morris intends to pursue preliminary relief, he must separately file a proper motion and supporting brief. See Local Rule 7.2(e) (motions for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions “shall not be taken up and considered unless set forth in a separate pleading accompanied by a separate brief”); compare FED. R. CIV. P. 65(a) (requirements for obtaining a temporary restraining order without notice to the opposing party) with (b) (requirements for obtaining a preliminary injunction with notice to the opposing party). SO ORDERED 15 May 2024.
iN es STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morris v. White, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-white-ared-2024.