Morris v. West Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Morris v. West Publishing Co.

1926 OK 541, 247 P. 52, 118 Okla. 237, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 887

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 8, 1926

Docket16703

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 1926 OK 541 (Morris v. West Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. West Publishing Co., 1926 OK 541, 247 P. 52, 118 Okla. 237, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 887 (Okla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

RAY, C.

The record in this case is neither settled and signed as a case-made as required by law, nor certified as a transcript. It does nob purport to be a bill of exceptions.

At the time the motion for new trial was overruled, the defendant, Morris, was given 60 days in which to make and serve a case-made. Plaintiff was given ten days to suggest amendments, and it was ordered that the case-made be settled and signed on five days written notice by either party to the other. The case-made was served July 23, 1925. It is not made to appear that any amendments were made or suggested.

August S, 1925, the defendant, Morris, forwarded to the plaintiff’s attorney through the U. S. mail a written notice that on the 11th day of August,- 1925, at 10 d’clock, en m., or as soon thereafter as counsel could be heard, the ease-made would be presented to the Honorable Charles Swindall at his chamber in the city of Enid for settlement. This notice was deposited 5n the U. S. post office as registered article Not 1393. .postage paid, addressed to Charles Alexander, attorney lor the 'plaintiff. On the 10th day of August. 1925. the defendant, Morris, received return card signed by Alexander, showing that ,a copy of the notice was received by him on August 9, 1925, The case-made was settled and signed August 11, 1925. The judge’s certificate recites that <-tlie plaintiff appeared not either in person or by attorney.” It will he observed that the case-made was settled and signed within three days after the written notice addressed to the attorney for the plain-,iff was deposited in the post office as registered mail. The order was that it should be settled and signed o-n five days' written notice by either party to the other. The cause was tried in Woodward county. The case-made was settled and signed in Garfield county pursuant to the written no* tice without any appearance or waiver on the part of the plaintiff.

This court has held that:

“Where the appellant presents a case-made to the trial judge and has the same settled and signed without giving the required notice, in thn absence of an appearance or waiver on the part of the appellee, such *238 case-made so settled cannot be considered in this court, and the appeal will be dismissed.” Walker v. Buckmaster, 90 Okla. 252, 217 Pac. 484.

The motion to dismiss contained in defendant in error’s brief is well taken, and the appeal is dismissed.

By the Court: Ic is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

RAY, C.

The record in this case is neither settled and signed as a case-made as required by law, nor certified as a transcript. It does nob purport to be a bill of exceptions.

At the time the motion for new trial was overruled, the defendant, Morris, was given 60 days in which to make and serve a case-made. Plaintiff was given ten days to suggest amendments, and it was ordered that the case-made be settled and signed on five days written notice by either party to the other. The case-made was served July 23, 1925. It is not made to appear that any amendments were made or suggested.

August S, 1925, the defendant, Morris, forwarded to the plaintiff’s attorney through the U. S. mail a written notice that on the 11th day of August,- 1925, at 10 d’clock, en m., or as soon thereafter as counsel could be heard, the ease-made would be presented to the Honorable Charles Swindall at his chamber in the city of Enid for settlement. This notice was deposited 5n the U. S. post office as registered article Not 1393. .postage paid, addressed to Charles Alexander, attorney lor the 'plaintiff. On the 10th day of August. 1925. the defendant, Morris, received return card signed by Alexander, showing that ,a copy of the notice was received by him on August 9, 1925, The case-made was settled and signed August 11, 1925. The judge’s certificate recites that <-tlie plaintiff appeared not either in person or by attorney.” It will he observed that the case-made was settled and signed within three days after the written notice addressed to the attorney for the plain-,iff was deposited in the post office as registered mail. The order was that it should be settled and signed o-n five days' written notice by either party to the other. The cause was tried in Woodward county. The case-made was settled and signed in Garfield county pursuant to the written no* tice without any appearance or waiver on the part of the plaintiff.

This court has held that:

“Where the appellant presents a case-made to the trial judge and has the same settled and signed without giving the required notice, in thn absence of an appearance or waiver on the part of the appellee, such *238 case-made so settled cannot be considered in this court, and the appeal will be dismissed.” Walker v. Buckmaster, 90 Okla. 252, 217 Pac. 484.

The motion to dismiss contained in defendant in error’s brief is well taken, and the appeal is dismissed.

By the Court: Ic is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1926 OK 541, 247 P. 52, 118 Okla. 237, 1926 Okla. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-west-publishing-co-okla-1926.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack