Morris v. Ursula H.

126 Cal. App. 3d 1048, 178 Cal. Rptr. 205, 1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2496
California Court of Appeal·Decided October 21, 1981·No. Civ. No. 50160·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

Ursula H. appeals from a judgment of the juvenile court adjudging her minor son, Jesse H., a dependent child of the court pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, removing the minor from appellant’s custody, and approving placement of the minor in a foster home.

We appointed counsel to represent appellant on appeal. Counsel filed a brief in which he set forth the facts of the case. He did not argue against his client, but advised the court he found no issues to argue on appellant’s behalf. We have examined the record and have found no arguable issue. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 [158 Cal.Rptr. 839, 600 P.2d 1071].) Appellant was given 30 days to file written argument in her own behalf. That period has passed, and we have received no communication from appellant.

[1050]*1050Judgment is affirmed.

Scott, Acting P. J., and Anello, J.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Ursula H., 126 Cal. App. 3d 1048, 178 Cal. Rptr. 205, 1981 Cal. App. LEXIS 2496 (Cal. Ct. App. 1981).

126 Cal. App. 3d 1048 (Morris v. Ursula H.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Jesse H.
126 Cal. App. 3d 1048 (California Court of Appeal, 1981)