Morris v. United States

520 F. App'x 205
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 2013
DocketNo. 12-8110
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 520 F. App'x 205 (Morris v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. United States, 520 F. App'x 205 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lonnie D. Morris appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge in part and dismissing his action filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act. We have reviewed the record and agree that Morris failed to comply with the requirements set forth in W. Va.Code Ann. § 55-7B-6 (LexisNexis 2008). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Morris v. United States, No. 3:12-cv-00073-GMG-DJJ, 2012 WL 6048936 (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 5, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials be[206]*206fore this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carroll v. United States
N.D. New York, 2024
Carter v. United States
S.D. West Virginia, 2019
Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice
N.D. West Virginia, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 F. App'x 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-united-states-ca4-2013.