Morris v. United Ohio Insurance

816 N.E.2d 1060, 103 Ohio St. 3d 462
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 10, 2004·No. Nos. 2003-0878 and 2003-1018·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for consideration of the remaining assignment of error and disposition in accordance with Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., 103 Ohio St.3d 170, 2004-Ohio-4885, 814 N.E.2d 1195.

Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. United Ohio Insurance, 816 N.E.2d 1060, 103 Ohio St. 3d 462 (Ohio 2004).

816 N.E.2d 1060 (Morris v. United Ohio Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pyros v. Loparo, Unpublished Decision (2-15-2005)
2005 Ohio 577 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Jackson v. State Auto Mutual, Unpublished Decision (2-15-2005)
2005 Ohio 586 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)