Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co.

792 N.E.2d 199, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1512

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 30, 2003

Docket2003-0878

StatusPublished

This text of 792 N.E.2d 199 (Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co., 792 N.E.2d 199, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1512 (Ohio 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Ross App. No. 02CA2653, 2003-0hio-1708. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only, cause consolidated with 2003-1018, Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co., Ross App. No. 02CA2653, 2003-0hio-1708, causes held for the decision in 2003-0474, Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-02-1166, 2003-Ohio-488, and briefing schedule stayed.

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur but would also allow all other propositions of law. Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ross App. No. 02CA2653, 2003-0hio-1708. Discretionary appeal allowed on Proposition of Law No. I only, cause consolidated with 2003-1018, Morris v. United Ohio Ins. Co., Ross App. No. 02CA2653, 2003-0hio-1708, causes held for the decision in 2003-0474, Kyle v. Buckeye Union Ins. Co., Lucas App. No. L-02-1166, 2003-Ohio-488, and briefing schedule stayed.

O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur but would also allow all other propositions of law. Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

792 N.E.2d 199, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1512, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-united-ohio-ins-co-ohio-2003.