Morris v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.
13 N.E. 455, 106 N.Y. 678, 61 Sickels 678, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 975
This text of 13 N.E. 455 (Morris v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Morris v. . the New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co., 13 N.E. 455, 106 N.Y. 678, 61 Sickels 678, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 975 (N.Y. 1887).
Opinion
reads for reversal and new trial.
All concur, except Daneobtii, J., dissenting.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Viner v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.
3 A.D.2d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)
Prunty v. Allred
165 P.2d 935 (California Court of Appeal, 1946)
Poliakoff v. Shelton
8 S.E.2d 494 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1940)
Pacific S. S. Co. v. Holt
77 F.2d 192 (Ninth Circuit, 1935)
Bassell v. Hines
269 F. 231 (Sixth Circuit, 1920)
Dorr v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
152 A.D. 342 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1912)
Adams v. Louisville & Nashville R. R.
121 S.W. 419 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1909)
Christensen v. Oregon Short Line Railroad
99 P. 676 (Utah Supreme Court, 1909)
Farrier v. Colorado Springs Rapid Transit Railway Co.
42 Colo. 331 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)
Stappers v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
106 N.Y.S. 854 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1907)
Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Rose
79 N.E. 1094 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1907)
Whiting v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
97 A.D. 11 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)
Dochtermann v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
32 A.D. 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
Stierle v. . Union Railway Co.
50 N.E. 419 (New York Court of Appeals, 1898)
McGrell v. Buffalo Office Building Co.
47 N.E. 305 (New York Court of Appeals, 1897)
Conroy v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.
70 N.W. 486 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1897)
McKeon v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
35 L.R.A. 252 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1896)
Rattagliata v. Hubbell
27 N.Y.S. 409 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)
Buck v. Manhattan Railway Co.
10 N.Y.S. 107 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1890)
Flanagan v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
5 Silv. Sup. 495 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
13 N.E. 455, 106 N.Y. 678, 61 Sickels 678, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-the-new-york-central-and-hudson-river-rd-co-ny-1887.