Morris v. State

94 S.W.2d 1169, 130 Tex. Crim. 533, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 18, 1936
DocketNo. 18066.
StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.W.2d 1169 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. State, 94 S.W.2d 1169, 130 Tex. Crim. 533, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323 (Tex. 1936).

Opinions

Conviction for failing to stop and render aid; punishment, a fine of one hundred dollars.

What purports to be a recognizance of the appellant was entered into after the adjournment of the trial term of the court below. It is statutory in this State that if a recognizance be not entered into during the trial term, an appeal bond must be made. See Art. 818, C. C. P. In the absence of such appeal bond this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed, and the appellant is given fifteen days from the date, of this judgment in which to file a new appeal bond.

ON MOTION FOR REINSTATEMENT OF APPEAL.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.W.2d 1169, 130 Tex. Crim. 533, 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.