Morris v. State

38 Tex. 603
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1873
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 38 Tex. 603 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. State, 38 Tex. 603 (Tex. 1873).

Opinion

Walker, J.

These cases are submitted together, and what we have to say in the one will apply to both. We think the proof of the character of a house which has [604]*604become notorious in a city, by general reputation, is sufficient to establish the character of the house; and it is the character which the house bears in the community which forms the subject of inquiry.

The appellants in these cases can take nothing from the bills of exceptions; they had everything to gain, and nothing to lose, by the ruling of the court; and the court ruled correctly, that the witnesses were not bound to answer the question if it would degrade them. When they declined answering the question, taking refuge behind their privilege, it is very evident that if the court had compelled them to answer, the answers would have been damaging to the appellant.

The judgments of the District' Court are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Jamerson
60 F. Supp. 281 (N.D. Iowa, 1944)
People v. Domínguez Pérez
39 P.R. 601 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1929)
Pueblo v. Domínguez Pérez
39 P.R. Dec. 664 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1929)
Clark v. State
174 S.W. 354 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)
Smith v. State
162 S.W. 835 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Golden v. State
160 S.W. 957 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Joliff v. State
109 S.W. 176 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
State v. Cambron
105 N.W. 241 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
Demartini v. Anderson
59 P. 207 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Commonwealth v. Murr
7 Pa. Super. 391 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1898)
Stone v. State
2 S.W. 585 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)
Cook v. State
3 S.W. 749 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1886)
Allen v. State
15 Tex. Ct. App. 320 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1884)
State v. Smith
12 N.W. 524 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1882)
Lowe v. State
4 Tex. Ct. App. 34 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1878)
Brown v. State
2 Tex. Ct. App. 189 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1877)
Sylvester v. State
42 Tex. 496 (Texas Supreme Court, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Tex. 603, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-tex-1873.