Morris v. State
This text of Morris v. State (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Anthony Lamont Morris, Petitioner,
v.
State of South Carolina, Respondent.
Appeal from Greenville County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Memorandum Opinion No. 2008-MO-013
Submitted January 23, 2008 Filed March 10, 2008
AFFIRMED
Joenathan S. Chaplin, of Columbia, for petitioner.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Karen C. Ratigan, of Columbia, for respondent.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: Harden v. State, 360 S.C. 405, 602 S.E.2d 48 (2004) (petitioner bears the burden of proving both attorney error and prejudice); Bruno v. State, 347 S.C. 446, 556 S.E.2d 393 (2001) (upholding denial of relief where finding of no prejudice is supported by the record).
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, PLEICONES and BEATTY, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morris v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-sc-2008.