Morris v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Morris v. State

1920 OK CR 64, 188 P. 684, 17 Okla. Crim. 707, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 58

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 6, 1920

DocketNo. A-3140.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 64 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. State, 1920 OK CR 64, 188 P. 684, 17 Okla. Crim. 707, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 58 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Bob Morris, was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession certain intoxicating liquors with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered June 2, 1917, he appealed by filing in this court September 19, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. No brief had been filed and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error when the ease was called for final submission, whereupon the Attorney General moved that the judgment be affirmed or the appeal dismissed for failure to prosecute the appeal. It appearing that the appeal in this case has been abandoned, the motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment to be carried into execution.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Bob Morris, was convicted on a charge that he did have in his possession certain intoxicating liquors with the unlawful intent to sell the same, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined for 30 days in the county jail and to pay a fine of $100. From the judgment rendered June 2, 1917, he appealed by filing in this court September 19, 1917, a petition in error with case-made. No brief had been filed and no appearance made on behalf of the plaintiff in error when the ease was called for final submission, whereupon the Attorney General moved that the judgment be affirmed or the appeal dismissed for failure to prosecute the appeal. It appearing that the appeal in this case has been abandoned, the motion to dismiss is sustained, and the cause remanded to the trial court, with direction to cause its judgment to be carried into execution.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 64, 188 P. 684, 17 Okla. Crim. 707, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.