Morris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morris v. State

964 S.W.2d 463, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 242, 1998 WL 50117

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Mo. App. LEXIS 1265 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 10, 1998·No. No. 71936·Published

Opinion

[464]*464ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-eonviction relief "without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[464]*464ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-eonviction relief "without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the motion court’s determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, prepared a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Morris v. State, 964 S.W.2d 463, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 242, 1998 WL 50117 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

964 S.W.2d 463 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.