Morris v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Morris v. State

815 S.W.2d 94, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 1991 WL 158534

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 1675 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 20, 1991·No. No. 59504·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the allegations in his motion, the transcript of his plea of guilty, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. Those findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. Movant’s allegations are refuted by the record. No precedential value would be served by an opinion.

[95]*95The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the allegations in his motion, the transcript of his plea of guilty, and the findings and conclusions of the motion court. Those findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully supported by the record and are not clearly erroneous. Movant’s allegations are refuted by the record. No precedential value would be served by an opinion.

[95]*95The judgment of the motion court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Morris v. State, 815 S.W.2d 94, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 1991 WL 158534 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

815 S.W.2d 94 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.