Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Morris v. State

249 S.E.2d 668, 147 Ga. App. 595, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2863

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedOctober 5, 1978

Docket56574

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 249 S.E.2d 668 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. State, 249 S.E.2d 668, 147 Ga. App. 595, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 2863 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

We affirm the appellant’s conviction for rape, aggravated sodomy, kidnapping and motor vehicle theft.

1. "Any enumerated error which is not supported in the brief by citation of authority or argument shall be deemed to have been abandoned.” Rule 18(c) (2) of Court of Appeals (Code Ann. § 24-3618(c) (2)); Warren v. State, 145 Ga. App. 565 (244 SE2d 103) (1978). We accordingly deem all but the eighth enumeration to have been abandoned.

2. The eighth enumeration contends that nine photographs introduced by the state were admitted into evidence without proper foundation. Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the photographer’s testimony was not required. Atlanta, B. &c. R. Co. v. Patterson, 75 Ga. App. 189 (3) (43 SE2d 177) (1947). Since the victim identified the photographs as portrayals of locations where she went before, during, and after she was attacked, the photographs were properly admitted.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., and Banke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI