Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Morris v. State

149 S.E. 103, 40 Ga. App. 163, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 68

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 9, 1929

Docket19799

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 103 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. State, 149 S.E. 103, 40 Ga. App. 163, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 68 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Morris, a cropper, was convicted of disposing of a part of the crop grown by him before his landlord had received the landlord^ part of the crop. He moved for a new trial upon the usual general grounds and upon the ground that the venue was not proved. The evidence is amply sufficient to show that Morris [164]*164committed the offense charged; and the venue was shown by the landlord’s testimony that defendant was a cropper on land “which was partly in the 108th and 111th districts, Georgia Militia, . . Hancock county.”

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Morris, a cropper, was convicted of disposing of a part of the crop grown by him before his landlord had received the landlord^ part of the crop. He moved for a new trial upon the usual general grounds and upon the ground that the venue was not proved. The evidence is amply sufficient to show that Morris [164]*164committed the offense charged; and the venue was shown by the landlord’s testimony that defendant was a cropper on land “which was partly in the 108th and 111th districts, Georgia Militia, . . Hancock county.”

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.E. 103, 40 Ga. App. 163, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-gactapp-1929.