Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Morris v. State

134 S.E. 340, 35 Ga. App. 569, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 986

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 13, 1926

Docket17364

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 340 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. State, 134 S.E. 340, 35 Ga. App. 569, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 986 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Upon conflicting evidence Morris was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The evidence authorized his conviction; and the trial judge, having approved that verdict, properly overruled his motion for a new trial which was based upon the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.. F. W. Copeland, J. L. Wallace, R. C. Stanton, for plaintiff in error. Alec Harris, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Upon conflicting evidence Morris was convicted of violating the prohibition statute. The evidence authorized his conviction; and the trial judge, having approved that verdict, properly overruled his motion for a new trial which was based upon the general grounds only.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.. F. W. Copeland, J. L. Wallace, R. C. Stanton, for plaintiff in error. Alec Harris, solicitor, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 S.E. 340, 35 Ga. App. 569, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 986, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-gactapp-1926.