Morris v. State
This text of 391 S.E.2d 927 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Darrell Morris shot and killed Adrian Dixon with a handgun. He was convicted of malice murder and sentenced to life imprisonment.1
1. The evidence showed that Morris and Dixon argued over a sum of money that Dixon claimed Morris owed to him because of an illegal [252]*252drug sale. Dixon had no weapon. Morris shot Dixon three times. He left the scene of the homicide and threw away the weapon. Two days later, Morris surrendered himself. He contended that he had killed Dixon in self-defense.
2. (a) Morris’ sole contention on appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence.
(b) The evidence is sufficient to permit a rational trier of fact to find Morris guilty of malice murder beyond reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
391 S.E.2d 927, 260 Ga. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-ga-1990.