Morris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morris v. State

67 So. 3d 1133, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 2011 WL 3109393

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 27, 2011

Docket4D09-4832

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 67 So. 3d 1133 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. State, 67 So. 3d 1133, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 2011 WL 3109393 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McMullen v. State, 714 So.2d 368, 372 (Fla.1998) (recognizing “the admissibility of expert testimony regarding the reliability of eyewitness testimony is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge”); Johnson v. State, 438 So.2d 774, 777 (Fla.1983) (finding no abuse of discretion in refusal to permit psychology professor to testify concerning common problems with eyewitness identification; “a jury is fully capable of assessing a witness’ ability to perceive and remember, given the assistance of cross-examination and cautionary instructions, without the aid of expert testimony”).

STEVENSON, GROSS, JJ., and STREITFELD, JEFFREY E., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McMullen v. State, 714 So.2d 368, 372 (Fla.1998) (recognizing “the admissibility of expert testimony regarding the reliability of eyewitness testimony is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge”); Johnson v. State, 438 So.2d 774, 777 (Fla.1983) (finding no abuse of discretion in refusal to permit psychology professor to testify concerning common problems with eyewitness identification; “a jury is fully capable of assessing a witness’ ability to perceive and remember, given the assistance of cross-examination and cautionary instructions, without the aid of expert testimony”).

STEVENSON, GROSS, JJ., and STREITFELD, JEFFREY E., Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 So. 3d 1133, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 11750, 2011 WL 3109393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack