Morris v. State
171 So. 2d 39
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Bias v. State of Florida, (Fla.App.1960) 118 So.2d 63; Younghans v. State of Florida, (Fla.App.1957) 97 So.2d 31; Richards v. State of Florida, 144 Fla. 177, 197 So. 772.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. State, 171 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).
171 So. 2d 39 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Younghans v. State
97 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1957)
Richards v. State
197 So. 772 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1940)
Bias v. State
118 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)