Morris v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Morris v. State

171 So. 2d 39

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 21, 1965

DocketNo. F-441

StatusPublished

This text of 171 So. 2d 39 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. State, 171 So. 2d 39 (Fla. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Bias v. State of Florida, (Fla.App.1960) 118 So.2d 63; Younghans v. State of Florida, (Fla.App.1957) 97 So.2d 31; Richards v. State of Florida, 144 Fla. 177, 197 So. 772.

STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See Bias v. State of Florida, (Fla.App.1960) 118 So.2d 63; Younghans v. State of Florida, (Fla.App.1957) 97 So.2d 31; Richards v. State of Florida, 144 Fla. 177, 197 So. 772.

STURGIS, C. J., and WIGGINTON and CARROLL, DONALD K., JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 So. 2d 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-fladistctapp-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack