Morris v. State
91 So. 2d 640
Opinion
This cause came on to he heard on the motion of appellee to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the Rules of this Court and it appearing to the Court from an examination of the record that said Motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
It is accordingly ordered, adjudged and decreed that the motion to affirm the judgment appealed from be, and the same is, hereby granted, and the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. State, 91 So. 2d 640 (Fla. 1956).
91 So. 2d 640 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Charles Morris v. Nathan Mayo, Custodian, Florida State Prison
277 F.2d 103 (Fifth Circuit, 1960)
Field v. Field
91 So. 2d 640 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)