Morris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

355 So. 2d 838, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15422
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1978
DocketNo. 76-2178
StatusPublished

This text of 355 So. 2d 838 (Morris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 355 So. 2d 838, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15422 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court’s declaratory order dismissing his amended complaint because P. I. P. benefits are not allowed under the Florida “No Fault” Act to occupants of motorcycles.

We have concluded that no reversible error has been demonstrated, therefore the order appealed is affirmed. Garcia v. Allstate Insurance Company, 327 So.2d 784 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Brandal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 327 So.2d 867 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976); Long Island Insurance Co. v. Frank, 328 So.2d 542 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garcia v. Allstate Insurance Company
327 So. 2d 784 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Brandal v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
327 So. 2d 867 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Long Island Insurance v. Frank
328 So. 2d 542 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 So. 2d 838, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-fladistctapp-1978.