Morris v. State (Ex parte Morris)

Supreme Court of Alabama

Morris v. State (Ex parte Morris)

261 So. 3d 1203

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided March 23, 2018·No. 1151265·Published

Opinion

MENDHEIM, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

Stuart, C.J., and Bolin, Parker, Shaw, Bryan, and Sellers, JJ., concur.

Main and Wise, JJ., recuse themselves.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MENDHEIM, Justice.

The writ of certiorari is quashed.

In quashing the writ of certiorari, this Court does not wish to be understood as approving all the language, reasons, or statements of law in the Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion. Horsley v. Horsley, 291 Ala. 782, 280 So.2d 155 (1973).

WRIT QUASHED.

Stuart, C.J., and Bolin, Parker, Shaw, Bryan, and Sellers, JJ., concur.

Main and Wise, JJ., recuse themselves.

Morris v. State (Ex parte Morris), 261 So. 3d 1203 (Ala. 2018).

Pincite

261 So. 3d 1203 (Morris v. State (Ex parte Morris)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related