Morris v. State
This text of 2016 Ark. App. 11 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 11
ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CR-15-364
Opinion Delivered January 13, 2016 MONICA S. MORRIS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE POINSETT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. CR-2010-42]
STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE JOHN N. APPELLEE FOGLEMAN, JUDGE
AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED
M. MICHAEL KINARD, Judge
Appellant Monica S. Morris appeals from the revocation of her probation. Pursuant
to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k),
appellant’s counsel has filed a no-merit brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel, asserting
that there is no nonfrivolous argument to be made in support of an appeal.
Following the revocation hearing, the trial court found that appellant had violated her
probation by failing to report to her probation officer as directed and by introducing
contraband into a correctional facility. This was the only adverse ruling at the hearing, and
counsel adequately explains in his brief why there is no merit to an appeal of the revocation
decision.
From our review of the record and the brief presented to us, we find compliance with
Rule 4-3(k) and that the appeal is without merit. Accordingly, counsel’s motion to Cite as 2016 Ark. App. 11
withdraw is granted, and the revocation order is affirmed.
Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
HARRISON and HOOFMAN, JJ., agree.
Paul J. Teufel, for appellant.
No response.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 Ark. App. 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-arkctapp-2016.