Morris v. State
92 So. 910, 18 Ala. App. 435, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 123
Opinion
The defendant was convicted under an indictment which charged him with manufacturing prohibited liquors since January 25, 1919. There is no direct testimony in this case, nor circumstances, from which the inference could be drawn that the defendant manufactured liquor subsequent to January 25, 1919, and on this account the affirmative charge, as requested by the defendant, should have been given. Wadsworth v. State, ante, p. 352, 92 South. 245.
On this account the judgment of the circuit court must be reversed.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. State, 92 So. 910, 18 Ala. App. 435, 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 123 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922).
92 So. 910 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Knight v. State
97 So. 163 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Gay v. State
96 So. 646 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)