Morris v. State

602 So. 2d 501, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 452, 1992 WL 171725
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Morris v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1990 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 922
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided July 24, 1992·No. CR-91-752·Published

Opinion

MONTIEL, Judge.

Jim Morris filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Butler Circuit Court. The trial court denied the petition without a hearing. This court has consistently held that when a petition styled as a petition for writ of habeas corpus is filed and the allegations raised in the petition are cognizable in a proceeding under Rule 32, A.R.Cr.P., the cause should be entertained in the court of original conviction and the petitioner should be given the opportunity to file a proper post-conviction petition as required by Rule 32.6(a). Drayton v. State, 600 So.2d 1088 (Ala.Crim.App.1992) (and cases cited therein). Therefore, this case is remanded to the circuit court with directions that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be returned to the appellant so that he can have the opportunity to file a proper Rule 32 petition.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. State, 602 So. 2d 501, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 452, 1992 WL 171725 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

602 So. 2d 501 (Morris v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Drayton v. State
600 So. 2d 1088 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1992)