Morris v. State
This text of 151 So. 888 (Morris v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioners’ argument for the issuance of the writ of certiorari in the instant case runs counter to the rule that this court will not review the Court of Appeals on its finding of facts, Houston v. State (Ala. Sup.) 148 So 863; 1 Loveman, Joseph & Loeb v. Himrod, 226 Ala. 342, 147 So. 163; Postal Tel.-Cable *85 Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91, nor on questions not treated or considered m the opinion of that court, Ballard v. State, 219 Ala. 222, 121 So. 502; Whisenant v. State, 223 Ala. 550, 137 So. 457.
In accordance with this long-established rule, the writ must be here denied.
Writ denied.
227 Ala. 172.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 So. 888, 228 Ala. 84, 1933 Ala. LEXIS 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-state-ala-1933.