Morris v. Smith

1 Thompson 43, 1 Shan. Cas. 27
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1849
StatusPublished
Cited by67 cases

This text of 1 Thompson 43 (Morris v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Smith, 1 Thompson 43, 1 Shan. Cas. 27 (Tenn. 1849).

Opinion

G-reen, J.:

The rule allowing the chancellor to give time for the giving of bonds for the prosecution of appeal was established before I came on the bench. If it had not been so, I would never have consented to the establishment of the rule, and I. am unwilling to extend it beyond the adjudicated cases. The present'order is not within the rulé, and the appeal must be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oberholzer, F., et ux v. Galapo, S. Aplts.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2024
Jermaine D. English v. State of Florida
191 So. 3d 448 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2016)
State v. Reid
213 S.W.3d 792 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 2006)
Thompson v. State
153 S.E.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Smith
52 A.2d 288 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1947)
Lang v. Stoddard
13 Conn. Super. Ct. 135 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1944)
Hollarn v. Alden
1940 OK 120 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)
Rust v. Rust
117 S.W.2d 59 (Texas Supreme Court, 1938)
Jaramillo v. State Ex Rel. Board of County Com'rs
250 P. 729 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1926)
U'ren v. Bagley
245 P. 1074 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
Allison v. Massey
1925 OK 166 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)
Craig v. O'Rear
251 S.W. 828 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Crow v. Smith
92 So. 905 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1922)
Walton, Mayor v. Donnelly
1921 OK 258 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1921)
Jones v. Sandlin
87 So. 850 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1920)
Fellows v. Boston & Maine Railroad
98 A. 481 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1916)
Clark v. Mitchell
35 Nev. 464 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1913)
Coit v. Sistare
84 A. 119 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1912)
Smith v. Rauh
14 Ohio C.C. (n.s.) 33 (Putnam Circuit Court, 1910)
Crowder v. Fordyce Lumber Co.
125 S.W. 417 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Thompson 43, 1 Shan. Cas. 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-smith-tenn-1849.