Morris v. S.C.

411 P.3d 525, 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 344
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 28, 2018
DocketS246214
StatusPublished

This text of 411 P.3d 525 (Morris v. S.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. S.C., 411 P.3d 525, 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 344 (Cal. 2018).

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is whether an Appellate Division of the Superior Court is required to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a misdemeanor offense on an appeal by the prosecution. The previously issued stay remains in effect pending further order of this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
411 P.3d 525, 229 Cal. Rptr. 3d 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-sc-cal-2018.