Morris v. Ray Morris Housing Center, Inc.
This text of 365 S.E.2d 446 (Morris v. Ray Morris Housing Center, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal involves the validity of a restrictive covenant in an employment contract. Appellee Velstar Enterprises engages in the business of selling and renting mobile homes, and is the parent corporation of appellee Ray Morris Housing Center. The appellant, Ray Morris, began work for Velstar in 1983, and has signed an employment contract containing a restrictive covenant. In 1987 Morris left the employment of the appellees. The appellees subsequently filed suit against Morris, seeking to enjoin him from violating the restrictive covenant. The trial court held that the covenant was valid and permanently enjoined Morris from violating it. We reverse, on the ground that the scope of activities which the covenant prohibits Morris from engaging in is unreasonable. See Nat. Settlement Assoc. v. Creel, 256 Ga. 329 (3) (c) (349 SE2d 177) (1986); Hudgins & Co. v. Cole, 247 Ga. 182 (1) (274 SE2d 462) (1981).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
365 S.E.2d 446, 257 Ga. 814, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-ray-morris-housing-center-inc-ga-1988.