Morris v. Prickett

246 So. 2d 674, 46 Ala. App. 606, 1970 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 447
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1970·No. 6 Div. 185·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CATES, Judge.

Habeas corpus denied.

Morris, unattended by a lawyer, was' convicted in the City of Birmingham Recorder’s Court September 18, 1969, on two charges of trespass and two of assault and battery. One trespass and an assault occurred September 9, 1969, the other trespass and assault took place the next day. We see no agglutinative chronologic nexus as was applied in James v. Headley, 5 Cir., 410 F.2d 325.

No one conviction carried more than 180 days. Morris did not appeal for a trial de novo in the circuit court wherein he could have had a jury trial.

Since coram nobis must be sued out in the court convicting the prisoner, we cannot treat the instant petition as one for that writ because the proceeding sub judice, was in the circuit court.

Habeas corpus is not the proper remedy. Code 1940, T. 15, § 27. Anderson v. State, 41 Ala.App. 502, 139 So.2d 352; Ex parte Nuckols, 42 Ala.App. 269, 160 So.2d 655; Ex parte Nuckols, 276 Ala. 368, 162 So.2d 464.

The judgment below is due to be

Affirmed.

ALMON, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Prickett, 246 So. 2d 674, 46 Ala. App. 606, 1970 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 447 (Ala. Ct. App. 1970).

246 So. 2d 674 (Morris v. Prickett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. City of Montgomery
690 So. 2d 546 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1997)
Deming v. City of Mobile
677 So. 2d 1233 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1995)
Morris v. Prickett
246 So. 2d 664 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1971)