Morris v. Potter
This text of Morris v. Potter (Morris v. Potter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2153
CORNELIA MORRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DARRYL GARNER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (CA-04-858)
Submitted: May 5, 2006 Decided: June 5, 2006
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cornelia Morris, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Binkley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 - PER CURIAM:
Cornelia Morris appeals the magistrate judge’s order
granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil action. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge.
See Morris v. Potter, No. CA-04-858 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2005).* We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to jurisdiction of the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).
- 3 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Morris v. Potter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-potter-ca4-2006.