Morris v. Philadephia Rapid Transit Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Morris v. Philadephia Rapid Transit Co.

64 A. 464, 215 Pa. 317, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 788

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 14, 1906

DocketAppeal, No. 156

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A. 464 (Morris v. Philadephia Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Philadephia Rapid Transit Co., 64 A. 464, 215 Pa. 317, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 788 (Pa. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal might well be dismissed for disregard of the rules of court. The plaintiff’s statement is not printed as the rules require, and the omission is all the more material because it is claimed by the appellee that the case is argued here on entirely different ground from that urged in the court below.

But as it is practically admitted that the cause of action declared on was not proved, we need go no further. The learned judge was right in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

This appeal might well be dismissed for disregard of the rules of court. The plaintiff’s statement is not printed as the rules require, and the omission is all the more material because it is claimed by the appellee that the case is argued here on entirely different ground from that urged in the court below.

But as it is practically admitted that the cause of action declared on was not proved, we need go no further. The learned judge was right in directing a verdict for the defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A. 464, 215 Pa. 317, 1906 Pa. LEXIS 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-philadephia-rapid-transit-co-pa-1906.