Morris v. Perkins

97 S.E. 526, 148 Ga. 554, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 438
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1918
DocketNo. 763
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 526 (Morris v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Perkins, 97 S.E. 526, 148 Ga. 554, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 438 (Ga. 1918).

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The ruling made in the headnote needs no elaboration. The principle upon which it is based is fully discussed in the case of Boynton v. Ball, 121. U. S. 457 (7 Sup. Ct. 981, 30 L. ed. 985). See also section 17 (a) of the bankruptcy act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550, as amended (U. S. Comp. St. 1916, § 9601). The instant case differs in material facts from that of Adams v. Dickson, 72 Ga. 846.

The judge erred in refusing to sanction, the petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. Thrift Credit Union
14 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Strickland v. Household Finance Corp.
157 S.E. 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Elder v. Galloway
129 S.E. 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 526, 148 Ga. 554, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-perkins-ga-1918.