Morris v. Perkins

97 S.E. 526, 148 Ga. 554, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 438
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1918·No. No. 763·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The ruling made in the headnote needs no elaboration. The principle upon which it is based is fully discussed in the case of Boynton v. Ball, 121. U. S. 457 (7 Sup. Ct. 981, 30 L. ed. 985). See also section 17 (a) of the bankruptcy act of July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 550, as amended (U. S. Comp. St. 1916, § 9601). The instant case differs in material facts from that of Adams v. Dickson, 72 Ga. 846.

The judge erred in refusing to sanction, the petition.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Perkins, 97 S.E. 526, 148 Ga. 554, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 438 (Ga. 1918).

97 S.E. 526 (Morris v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haynes v. Thrift Credit Union
14 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Strickland v. Household Finance Corp.
157 S.E. 635 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Elder v. Galloway
129 S.E. 672 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)