Morris v. Norfolk Southern Railroad

197 N.C. 788
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 11, 1929
StatusPublished

This text of 197 N.C. 788 (Morris v. Norfolk Southern Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Norfolk Southern Railroad, 197 N.C. 788 (N.C. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

There was evidence of negligence and strong evidence of contributory negligence. However, the material conflict in the testi[789]*789mony created issues of fact. It was therefore necessary to submit the case to the jury. The verdict establishes facts imposing liability, and no error of law appears in the record. Hoggard v. R. R., 194 N. C., 256, 139 S. E., 372; Brown v. R. R., 195 N. C., 699, 140 S. E., 622.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winchester-Simmons Co. v. Cutler
140 S.E. 622 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Hoggard v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
139 S.E. 372 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Brown v. Southern Railway Co.
143 S.E. 536 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 N.C. 788, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-norfolk-southern-railroad-nc-1929.