Morris v. Norfolk Southern Railroad
197 N.C. 788
Opinion
There was evidence of negligence and strong evidence of contributory negligence. However, the material conflict in the testi[789]*789mony created issues of fact. It was therefore necessary to submit the case to the jury. The verdict establishes facts imposing liability, and no error of law appears in the record. Hoggard v. R. R., 194 N. C., 256, 139 S. E., 372; Brown v. R. R., 195 N. C., 699, 140 S. E., 622.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. Norfolk Southern Railroad, 197 N.C. 788 (N.C. 1929).
197 N.C. 788 (Morris v. Norfolk Southern Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Winchester-Simmons Co. v. Cutler
140 S.E. 622 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Hoggard v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
139 S.E. 372 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1927)
Brown v. Southern Railway Co.
143 S.E. 536 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)