Morris v. Morris

41 Ga. 271
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 15, 1870
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 41 Ga. 271 (Morris v. Morris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Morris, 41 Ga. 271 (Ga. 1870).

Opinion

WARNER, J.

The error assigned to the judgment of the Court below in this case, is in overruling the demurrer to the complainant’s bill. As a general rule, .Courts of Equity will not interfere to set aside a settlement of a fraudulent transaction of one of the parties, when the party defrauded had full knowledge of all the facts at the time of the settlement, and the parties making it occupied the same relative position to each other, as to capacity and condition, as was ruled by this Court in Ham v. Hamilton, 29th Georgia Reports, 40. But where it appears that there was great inequality between the parties making the settlement, arising from old age, want of 'mental capacity, undue influence, and the relative condition of the contracting parties to each other, a Court of Equity will interfere and grant relief, upon a proper case being made for that purpose. In our judgment, the allegations in '.complainant’s bill makes such a case as entitles her to have the alleged settlement set aside, and that the .general demurrer to the bill for want of equity was properly overruled.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. Jackson
44 S.E.2d 250 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Armour v. Lunsford
15 S.E.2d 886 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Harden v. Weaver
192 S.E. 384 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Eagan v. Conway
41 S.E. 493 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 Ga. 271, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-morris-ga-1870.