Morris v. Moody

Federal Circuit

Morris v. Moody

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedNovember 1, 2010

Docket2010-1329

StatusUnpublished

This text of Morris v. Moody (Morris v. Moody) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Moody, (Fed. Cir. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: ThiS order is n0r1precedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit KYLE MORRIS, SHARING WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, AND READSPEAK, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. DON MOODY, GARY FRIEDMAN, IRA SOCKOWITZ, THE LEARNING BOX, LLC, JOHN LEE, JACQUELINE MOODY, READY TO LEARN PARTNERSHIP, LLC, WORD WORLD, LLC, PETER SCHNEIDER, VVlNDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS, INC., THE PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., NOAH SHUBE, AND LAW OFFICES OF FRIEDMAN & SHUBE, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATION, AND XYZ CORPORATION, Defen,dcmts. 2010-1329, -1363 Appea1S from the United States District C0urt for the S0uthe1'n District of NeW Y0rk in case n0. 08-CV-'7683, Judge Jed S. Rak0ff.

MORRIS V. MOODY CC. S ON MOTION ORDER 2 Don Moody, et a1. submit a motion for sanctions. Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion for sanctions is deferred for considera- tion by the merits panel assigned to hear the case. (2) A copy of this order, the motion, and any response or reply shall be transmitted to the merits panel F0R THE CoUR'1‘ NUV r_ 1 2010 /s/ J an Horba1y Date J an Horba1y C1erk Roger Le0n Fid1er, Esq. Brad Richard NeWberg, Esq. F §§ 23 ,r§izr..MR ED RAL CIRCU|T N0\_‘ 01 2010 1AN HORBAL¥ CLERK

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: ThiS order is n0r1precedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit KYLE MORRIS, SHARING WORLD ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, AND READSPEAK, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, V. DON MOODY, GARY FRIEDMAN, IRA SOCKOWITZ, THE LEARNING BOX, LLC, JOHN LEE, JACQUELINE MOODY, READY TO LEARN PARTNERSHIP, LLC, WORD WORLD, LLC, PETER SCHNEIDER, VVlNDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS, INC., THE PUBLIC BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., NOAH SHUBE, AND LAW OFFICES OF FRIEDMAN & SHUBE, Defendants-Appellees, and JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATION, AND XYZ CORPORATION, Defen,dcmts. 2010-1329, -1363 Appea1S from the United States District C0urt for the S0uthe1'n District of NeW Y0rk in case n0. 08-CV-'7683, Judge Jed S. Rak0ff.

MORRIS V. MOODY CC. S ON MOTION ORDER 2 Don Moody, et a1. submit a motion for sanctions. Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion for sanctions is deferred for considera- tion by the merits panel assigned to hear the case. (2) A copy of this order, the motion, and any response or reply shall be transmitted to the merits panel F0R THE CoUR'1‘ NUV r_ 1 2010 /s/ J an Horba1y Date J an Horba1y C1erk Roger Le0n Fid1er, Esq. Brad Richard NeWberg, Esq. F §§ 23 ,r§izr..MR ED RAL CIRCU|T N0\_‘ 01 2010 1AN HORBAL¥ CLERK

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Morris v. Moody, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-moody-cafc-2010.