Morris v. Metalline Land Co.

31 A. 114, 166 Pa. 351, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1209
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 18, 1895·No. Appeal, No. 19·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Green,

In the cases 307, 326 and 368 March Term, 1894, in which [352] Brooking, Stevens and Miller were appellants, reported in vol. 164 Pa. Rep. 326, the parties to the record being the same as in the present case, we made a decree reversing the decree of the court below, and directing the record to be remitted with instructions to distribute the fund in the hands of the trustees in accordance with the opinion filed in those cases.

The present appeal, taken by B. A. Hoopes from the same decree, is in the same category with the former appeals and is controlled by the decision there made. For the reasons and upon the considerations stated in the former opinion we make the same decree as was there made.

The decree of the court below is reversed at the cost of the appellees, and the record is remitted with instructions to distribute the fund in the hands of the trustees in accordance with the opinion already filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Metalline Land Co., 31 A. 114, 166 Pa. 351, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 1209 (Pa. 1895).

31 A. 114 (Morris v. Metalline Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Germantown Trust Co. v. Forrest Hill Building & Loan Ass'n
190 A. 561 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)
Pennsylvania Co. v. Forrest Hill Building & Loan Ass'n
190 A. 556 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1936)