Morris v. McClinton
This text of 434 S.E.2d 174 (Morris v. McClinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff/appellant Ronald L. Morris filed suit on a note seeking to recover $15,000 plus interest allegedly owed to him by defendant? appellee Renee McClinton. After conducting a hearing, the trial court entered judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s denial of his motion for new trial.
1. The record does not support plaintiff’s contention that he was denied adequate representation by the attorney he employed to represent him in this case. The record reveals that plaintiff’s attorney complied with the requirements of Uniform Superior Court Rule 4.3 in seeking to withdraw as plaintiff’s counsel and that the trial court properly granted that motion. Thereafter, plaintiff elected to proceed pro se.
2. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court erred by failing to make a court reporter available to transcribe the proceedings in this case.
3. No transcript was submitted to this court of the proceedings below. We cannot determine the merit of plaintiff’s remaining enumerations of error without examining a transcript of the proceedings below.
4. Plaintiff’s request for remand to the State Court of Fulton County is denied.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
434 S.E.2d 174, 209 Ga. App. 88, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 1900, 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-mcclinton-gactapp-1993.