Morris v. Mayor of Bayonne

41 A. 924, 62 N.J.L. 385, 33 Vroom 385, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 17
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 27, 1898·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

This case is ruled by the decision of this court in Moran v. Jersey City, 29 Vroom 653.

[386]*386The matters argued before us by the plaintiff in error are at bottom questions of fact. The judgment rendered in the Supreme Court could be reversed only by reaching conclusions of fact variant from those found by that court. This, for the reasons given in the case cited, we are not at liberty to do. The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Depue, Garrison, Gummere, Lippincott, Van Syckel, Adams, Bogert, Hendrickson, Nixon, Vredenbhrgh. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Morris v. Mayor of Bayonne, 41 A. 924, 62 N.J.L. 385, 33 Vroom 385, 1898 N.J. LEXIS 17 (N.J. 1898).

41 A. 924 (Morris v. Mayor of Bayonne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kastens v. Town of West New York
211 A.2d 801 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1965)