Morris v. Koukoutchos

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Morris v. Koukoutchos

22 Va. Cir. 392, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 3

CourtFairfax County Circuit Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1991

DocketCase No. (Law) 99822

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 22 Va. Cir. 392 (Morris v. Koukoutchos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Fairfax County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Koukoutchos, 22 Va. Cir. 392, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 3 (Va. Super. Ct. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE MICHAEL P. McWEENY

This case comes before the Court upon defendant’s Demurrer to the punitive damages claim in the Amended Motion for Judgment. After hearing oral argument, the Court took the matter under advisement.

Upon review of the pleadings and the law, the Demurrer is sustained. In order to warrant the submission of the punitive damage issue in a personal injury case, Virginia requires that an "egregious set of facts" be presented. Hack v. Hester, Adm’r, 397 S.E.2d (adv. sheet) 851, 855, 7 V.L.R. 816, 823 (Nov. 9, 1990). There must be negligence which is so willful or wanton as to evince a conscious disregard of the rights of others. Booth v. Robertson, 236 Va. 269, 273 (1988).

In the present case, the plaintiff has alleged that the defendant, while intoxicated and travelling at an excessive rate of speed, rear-ended the plaintiff’s vehicle and then fled the scene. The allegation that intoxication caused a rear-end collision does not supply an inference of the wanton conduct necessary for the recovery of punitive [393]*393damages. See Baker v. Marcus, 201 Va. 905, 910 (1960). Such an accident could be caused by any driver who failed to exercise ordinary care, and the damages would have been the same whether the defendant was intoxicated or sober at the time. Eubank v. Spencer, 203 Va. 923, 926 (1962). The post-injury conduct of the defendant also would not afford a basis for awarding punitive damages, absent accompanying allegations of a willful and wanton course of conduct proximately causing the accident and the injuries. See generally 22 Am. Jur. 2d, Damages §§ 749, 772. The facts as set forth here in the Amended Motion for Judgment, even in combination, do not rise to the necessary level of wantonness.

Since the plaintiff’s allegations do not constitute a legally sufficient "egregious set of facts" for a punitive damages award, the Demurrer is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE MICHAEL P. McWEENY

This case comes before the Court upon defendant’s Demurrer to the punitive damages claim in the Amended Motion for Judgment. After hearing oral argument, the Court took the matter under advisement.

Upon review of the pleadings and the law, the Demurrer is sustained. In order to warrant the submission of the punitive damage issue in a personal injury case, Virginia requires that an "egregious set of facts" be presented. Hack v. Hester, Adm’r, 397 S.E.2d (adv. sheet) 851, 855, 7 V.L.R. 816, 823 (Nov. 9, 1990). There must be negligence which is so willful or wanton as to evince a conscious disregard of the rights of others. Booth v. Robertson, 236 Va. 269, 273 (1988).

In the present case, the plaintiff has alleged that the defendant, while intoxicated and travelling at an excessive rate of speed, rear-ended the plaintiff’s vehicle and then fled the scene. The allegation that intoxication caused a rear-end collision does not supply an inference of the wanton conduct necessary for the recovery of punitive [393]*393damages. See Baker v. Marcus, 201 Va. 905, 910 (1960). Such an accident could be caused by any driver who failed to exercise ordinary care, and the damages would have been the same whether the defendant was intoxicated or sober at the time. Eubank v. Spencer, 203 Va. 923, 926 (1962). The post-injury conduct of the defendant also would not afford a basis for awarding punitive damages, absent accompanying allegations of a willful and wanton course of conduct proximately causing the accident and the injuries. See generally 22 Am. Jur. 2d, Damages §§ 749, 772. The facts as set forth here in the Amended Motion for Judgment, even in combination, do not rise to the necessary level of wantonness.

Since the plaintiff’s allegations do not constitute a legally sufficient "egregious set of facts" for a punitive damages award, the Demurrer is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 Va. Cir. 392, 1991 Va. Cir. LEXIS 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-koukoutchos-vaccfairfax-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack