Morris v. Imperial Insurance

29 S.E. 927, 103 Ga. 567
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 19, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 29 S.E. 927 (Morris v. Imperial Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Imperial Insurance, 29 S.E. 927, 103 Ga. 567 (Ga. 1898).

Opinion

Gobb, J.

It being, under the evidence, an issuable question of fact whether or not the plaintiff below sufficiently complied with that stipulation in the policy of insurance sued upon, requiring him to “ keep a set of books which shall clearly and plainly present a complete record of business transacted, including all purchases, sales and shipments, both for cash and credit,” and the right of the plaintiff to a recovery depending upon the solution of this question, it was error to grant a nonsuit.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concurring, except Lewis, J., who was not a member of the court when this case was argued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ætna Insurance v. Johnson
56 S.E. 643 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)
Tucker v. Colonial Fire Insurance
51 S.E. 86 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E. 927, 103 Ga. 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-imperial-insurance-ga-1898.