Morris v. Imperial Insurance
This text of 29 S.E. 927 (Morris v. Imperial Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It being, under the evidence, an issuable question of fact whether or not the plaintiff below sufficiently complied with that stipulation in the policy of insurance sued upon, requiring him to “ keep a set of books which shall clearly and plainly present a complete record of business transacted, including all purchases, sales and shipments, both for cash and credit,” and the right of the plaintiff to a recovery depending upon the solution of this question, it was error to grant a nonsuit.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.E. 927, 103 Ga. 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-imperial-insurance-ga-1898.