Morris v. Humphrey

Eighth Circuit

Morris v. Humphrey

166 F.2d 142

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 12, 1948

DocketNo. 13689

StatusPublished

This text of 166 F.2d 142 (Morris v. Humphrey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Humphrey, 166 F.2d 142 (8th Cir. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition to review order of United States District Court, District of Minnesota, denying application for writ of habeas corpus and motion to proceed in forma pauperis in said District Court denied in all respects, without prejudice however to an application to the trial Court which passed sentence upon petitioner for the remedy established by Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. following section 687.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Petition to review order of United States District Court, District of Minnesota, denying application for writ of habeas corpus and motion to proceed in forma pauperis in said District Court denied in all respects, without prejudice however to an application to the trial Court which passed sentence upon petitioner for the remedy established by Rule 35 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A. following section 687.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F.2d 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-humphrey-ca8-1948.