Morris v. Hollis
This text of 2 Del. 4 (Morris v. Hollis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
sustained the objection and excluded the witness.,
The plaintiff had a verdict for $150 00 and a rule was granted, on his application, to show cause why this verdict should not be set-off against the verdict just recovered in the case of Hollis vs. Morri s; which, upon hearing, was made absolute. It appeared that the defendant in this case was insolvent, and the assignment of his verdict against the present plaintiff, had been made with a view to defeat the right of set-off, and with full knowledge, on the part of the assignee, of all the circumstances.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Del. 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-hollis-del-1835.