Morris v. Hayduk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Morris v. Hayduk

64 A.D.2d 933, 408 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12826

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 23, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 64 A.D.2d 933 (Morris v. Hayduk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Hayduk, 64 A.D.2d 933, 408 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding, inter alia, to validate the petition designating the petitioner as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1978, for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 93rd Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 17, 1978, which (1) granted the application and (2) directed the Board of Elections to place petitioner’s name upon the appropriate ballot. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements and application is denied (see Matter of Vari v Hayduk, 42 NY2d 980; Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993; see, also, Matter of Neuberger v Anderson, 64 AD2d 933). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding, inter alia, to validate the petition designating the petitioner as a candidate in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 12, 1978, for the public office of Member of the Assembly from the 93rd Assembly District, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered August 17, 1978, which (1) granted the application and (2) directed the Board of Elections to place petitioner’s name upon the appropriate ballot. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements and application is denied (see Matter of Vari v Hayduk, 42 NY2d 980; Matter of Rutter v Coveney, 38 NY2d 993; see, also, Matter of Neuberger v Anderson, 64 AD2d 933). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 A.D.2d 933, 408 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-hayduk-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack