Morris v. Geiger

10 N.J.L. 331
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1829
StatusPublished

This text of 10 N.J.L. 331 (Morris v. Geiger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Geiger, 10 N.J.L. 331 (N.J. 1829).

Opinion

The

Chief Justice

asked, if any notice of the motion had been given to the plaintiff’s attorney.

Morris said that none had been given, because he supposed none was necessary, and cited the case of Ogden ads. Hughes

The court refused to hear the motion because notice of the application had not been given to the plaintiff’s átíorney.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 N.J.L. 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-geiger-nj-1829.