Morris v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of Texas

Morris v. Edwards

1 White & W. 262

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 12, 1878

DocketNo. —, Op. Book No. 1, p. 516

StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 262 (Morris v. Edwards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Edwards, 1 White & W. 262 (Tex. Ct. App. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 525. Appeal bond; must state names of all parties to the judgment appealed from. The judgment rendered in the court below was against Samuel Morris, as principal, and J. M. Hughes and Ira Williams, as his sureties. The appeal bond describes the judgment as one rendered against Samuel Morris. Held, an appeal bond should give the names of all the parties to the judgment appealed from. If any are omitted, the judgment is misdescribed. [Jenkins v. McNeese, 34 Tex. 189.]

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Ector, P. J.

§ 525. Appeal bond; must state names of all parties to the judgment appealed from. The judgment rendered in the court below was against Samuel Morris, as principal, and J. M. Hughes and Ira Williams, as his sureties. The appeal bond describes the judgment as one rendered against Samuel Morris. Held, an appeal bond should give the names of all the parties to the judgment appealed from. If any are omitted, the judgment is misdescribed. [Jenkins v. McNeese, 34 Tex. 189.]

Appeal dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 White & W. 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-edwards-texapp-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack