Morris v. Department of Justice
This text of 54 F.3d 785 (Morris v. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
54 F.3d 785
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
James William MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Federal Bureau of Investigation;
Central Intelligence Agency; United States
Department of Defense; City of San
Diego; San Diego Police Dept.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-56044.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted May 16, 1995.*
Decided May 22, 1995.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
James William Morris appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court order.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F.3d 785, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22413, 1995 WL 309932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-department-of-justice-ca9-1995.