Morris v. Department of Justice

54 F.3d 785, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22413, 1995 WL 309932
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 22, 1995
Docket94-56044
StatusPublished

This text of 54 F.3d 785 (Morris v. Department of Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Department of Justice, 54 F.3d 785, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22413, 1995 WL 309932 (9th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

54 F.3d 785
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

James William MORRIS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; Federal Bureau of Investigation;
Central Intelligence Agency; United States
Department of Defense; City of San
Diego; San Diego Police Dept.,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-56044.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 16, 1995.*
Decided May 22, 1995.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and NOONAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

James William Morris appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his action. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm for the reasons stated in the district court order.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 F.3d 785, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 22413, 1995 WL 309932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-department-of-justice-ca9-1995.