Morris v. De Mars
1 U.S. 140, 1 Dall. 140
Opinion
IT was ruled in this case, that a relation of a superior and inferior officer, does not, of itself, bind the former to pay the contracts of the latter, whether in the staff or line. But if the inferior officer had an authority to contract, and having obtained money for the use of the army, applied it accordingly, in such case the Court inclined to think, that the superior would be liable for the debt, provided he had sufficient public funds to discharge it.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Morris v. De Mars, 1 U.S. 140, 1 Dall. 140 (1785).
1 U.S. 140 (Morris v. De Mars) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Antonio Goodwin v. AT&T
D. Nevada, 2026
Eddy Rodrigo Gregorio Ordoñez v. Pamela Bondi, et al.
W.D. Washington, 2025
Harold Wilson Stone, III v. Rosie Rivera
W.D. Washington, 2025
Demos v. Gonzalez
W.D. Washington, 2024
Petersen v. Flood
W.D. Washington, 2024
Lewis v. Skagit County
W.D. Washington, 2024
Silva v. Western State Hospital
W.D. Washington, 2024
Harrison v. Vale Oregon Irrigation District
D. Oregon, 2024