Morris v. Danon

213 A.D.2d 192, 624 N.Y.S.2d 809

This text of 213 A.D.2d 192 (Morris v. Danon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Morris v. Danon, 213 A.D.2d 192, 624 N.Y.S.2d 809 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered December 8, 1993, which awarded plaintiff $100,000 plus interest, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Any conflict in the testimony with respect to whether Brevitol could have entered plaintiffs wrist by the insertion of a hypodermic into either the back of her hand or her wrist, and any conflict in the expert opinions with respect to causation of the injury, were for the jury to resolve and we decline to disturb its determination. We have considered appellants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
213 A.D.2d 192, 624 N.Y.S.2d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-danon-nyappdiv-1995.