Morris v. Danon
This text of 213 A.D.2d 192 (Morris v. Danon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Schoenfeld, J.), entered December 8, 1993, which awarded plaintiff $100,000 plus interest, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Any conflict in the testimony with respect to whether Brevitol could have entered plaintiffs wrist by the insertion of a hypodermic into either the back of her hand or her wrist, and any conflict in the expert opinions with respect to causation of the injury, were for the jury to resolve and we decline to disturb its determination. We have considered appellants’ other contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur— Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Tom, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D.2d 192, 624 N.Y.S.2d 809, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-danon-nyappdiv-1995.