Morris v. Danielson

New York Supreme Court

Morris v. Danielson

3 Hill & Den. 168

DecidedJuly 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Hill & Den. 168 (Morris v. Danielson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Morris v. Danielson, 3 Hill & Den. 168 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court, Bronson, J.

When the plaintiff had proved that the defendants were found taking away and disposing of his property, of which he had just before been in possession, it was enough to cast the burden on the defendants of showing how they came to the possession of the property. We are not to presume that the horses strayed from the plaintiff, or that the defendants got them by purchase or bailment. There was not only evidence enough to carry the cause to the jury, but if that evidence was not answered, the plaintiff would clearly be entitled to a verdict in his favor.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court, Bronson, J.

When the plaintiff had proved that the defendants were found taking away and disposing of his property, of which he had just before been in possession, it was enough to cast the burden on the defendants of showing how they came to the possession of the property. We are not to presume that the horses strayed from the plaintiff, or that the defendants got them by purchase or bailment. There was not only evidence enough to carry the cause to the jury, but if that evidence was not answered, the plaintiff would clearly be entitled to a verdict in his favor.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Hill & Den. 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/morris-v-danielson-nysupct-1842.